Search our news, events & opinions

14 November 2018 0 Comments
Posted in Employment, Opinion

The “Ryanair 6” and the damage social media can cause your brand

Author headshot image Posted by , Partner

The danger of social media should not be underestimated. This was recently highlighted by “the Ryanair 6” over the course of the last 4 weeks whereby despite Ryanair finding that the 6 had staged a picture of them being subjected to appalling working conditions and dismissing the 6 for gross misconduct; the damage was already done.


On 14 October 2018 4 Ryanair planes were diverted from Porto (Portugal) to Malaga (Spain) due to Storm Leslie. Due to the severe weather conditions and a national holiday; hotel accommodation was not easy to come by and Ryanair’s crew were asked to go to a crew room for “a short period time”.

At this point a photo appeared online, from one of the members of the cabin crew, suggesting that the one of the plane’s crew were “forced” to sleep on the floor as Ryanair were refusing to place them in a hotel or provide them with “suitable accommodation” and “the company left them there”.

The photo went viral, attracting wide range criticism from the public. Ryanair, in a surprising move, Tweeted the CCTV footage of the crew room in response. This showed that the cabin crew staged the picture and in fact they were moved to a VIP lounge within a short time frame.

Leaving aside the possible GDPR ramifications and interesting public relations spin (or damage), the question arose that if this was a “staged picture” with the intention of causing damage to the employer or their brand – what would be the ramifications?

Company Handbooks often include examples of gross misconduct which include “bringing the company into serious disrepute”. One problem with this allegation can be, when considering the actions of the employee, if it amounts to serious disrepute and thus gross misconduct.

Social media can be particularly dangerous when considering reputational damage as once an employee “posts” something their control over it can disappear; despite the misconception it is the employee’s post. If the employer can be tied to it (through either the image, their naming in a post or even the employee stating that they work for the employer) then the damage can be huge.

Ryanair confirmed this week that they had dismissed the Ryanair 6 for gross misconduct, on the basis the 6 in question had “caused irreparable breach of trust” and damaged the company’s reputation and on the basis of the media frenzy. Given the interest even now, it could be said the damage is continuing even today.

Whilst the decision to Tweet the CCTV in response can be questioned, it is worth reading the responses to Ryanair’s Tweet (17 October 2018) to gain an understanding of just how much anger there was that a company could behave in this manner even if it was a “protest”.

This story (and maybe even case if it reaches a Tribunal) is a timely reminder of the danger of social media, and the need to make sure your employees are aware that their actions, even if in protest, can cause huge damage to a company. With generation Z entering the workforce, often referred to as “natives within social media”, we expect employers to be tested even further.

If you have any enquiries please contact Paul Hayward on:

01865 268 688     Email

Leave a comment

Thank you for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name or it will be deleted.





It pays to employ the right employment solicitor

Learn more


T: 01865 268 639 (DDI)

Search our news, events & opinions