Posted by Natalie Birrell (PR Consultant),
On 1 September 2016 Withy King LLP merged with Royds LLP. The trading name for the merged firm is Royds Withy King. All content produced prior to this date will remain in the name of the firms pre-merger.
Striking out Tribunal claims
In Ahmed v Bedford Borough Council, the EAT held that a discrimination claim could not be struck out for a wilful failure on the part of the Claimant to comply with Tribunal orders unless consideration had been given to whether …
In Ahmed v Bedford Borough Council, the EAT held that a discrimination claim could not be struck out for a wilful failure on the part of the Claimant to comply with Tribunal orders unless consideration had been given to whether the failure rendered a fair trial of the issues impossible.
The Claimant unreasonably failed to comply with the Tribunal’s order that he be examined by medial expert for the purposes of a PHR on the issue of disability – he bought discrimination claims for race, religious belief and disability. The Tribunal struck out the claim in its entirety as a result.
However the EAT held that the issues to be considered were whether the conduct in question was scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious; whether a fair trial was still possible; and whether the sanction of striking out the claim was proportionate. It held that the Tribunal had not given sufficient consideration to the last two conditions i.e. whether a lesser sanction was appropriate, and the matter was therefore remitted to a different employment judge.
This case is a prime example of how difficult it is to get a claim struck out against a Claimant, however badly they may behave in failing to comply with orders.
This legal update is provided for general information purposes only and should not be applied to specific circumstances without prior consultation with us.
For further details on any of the issues covered in this update please contact Gemma Ospedale, Partner in Employment on 020 7583 2222.