Posted by Natalie Birrell (PR Consultant),
On 1 September 2016 Withy King LLP merged with Royds LLP. The trading name for the merged firm is Royds Withy King. All content produced prior to this date will remain in the name of the firms pre-merger.
Redundancy selection and competency assessment
The case in this section gives some interesting guidance to employers carrying out a redundancy process and operating selection criteria. Purely objective criteria may not, in isolation, always be the most appropriate ones to use. [read more] In Mental Health …
The case in this section gives some interesting guidance to employers carrying out a redundancy process and operating selection criteria. Purely objective criteria may not, in isolation, always be the most appropriate ones to use. [read more] In Mental Health Care (UK) Limited v Biluan and another, the EAT has held that it is not necessarily fair to carry out a redundancy selection exercise based purely on competency tests at the time, especially if no consideration has been given to past performance.
The employer conducted a redundancy exercise selecting staff from criteria comprising disciplinary and absence records and a competency assessment. In the vast majority of cases it was the competency assessment score which was decisive. The manager expressed surprise at the results, stating that several of those selected for redundancy on the basis of the competency test were good employees. The Tribunal held that the dismissals were unfair. This was because capability had been assessed mainly on the competency assessments and had not taken any account of previous performance.
The employer appealed on the basis that the Tribunal had substituted its own view for that of the employer. The appeal was dismissed; however, the EAT acknowledged that the employer took care over the process but chose what was described as an “elaborate and HR driven method” which prevented it from obtaining input from managers and others who knew the staff in question. The EAT commented that while it was important to avoid to much subjectivity and bias selection, an element of subjectivity may well be needed to ensure that the overall selection process is fair.
This legal update is provided for general information purposes only and should not be applied to specific circumstances without prior consultation with us.
For further details on any of the issues covered in this update please contact Gemma Ospedale, Partner in Employment on 020 7583 2222.
Royds Import Case Law Update
Keeping you informed about Royds Import Case Law Update news, events and opinion.