Here to help after a denied a Permanent Health Insurance (PHI) claim
If you have a long-term illness or injury, taking measures to safeguard your income when you are ill is essential. If the insurer won’t pay, or decides to terminate your claim, we can help.
Call for a free consultation on whether you have a claim
0800 923 2068
- Skilled team of insurance litigators
- Close links with leading charities
- Accredited personal injury solicitors
- Understand medical & legal aspects of a claim
Here to help when you're denied PHI
Our team at Royds Withy King have over 25 years’ experience in dealing with all types of PHI dispute.
Your employer may have a Group Income Protection scheme. If the insurer won’t pay, or decides to terminate your claim, you need to urgently contact experts like ourselves to give you the best chance of securing the income that you urgently need.
The illnesses we tend to deal with for claimants tend to be the “invisible” conditions including:
- Chronic pain and Fibromyalgia
- Long Covid
- Psychiatric disorders
Find out more about what to do in the event your Permanent Health Insurance has been denied, is being reviewed, or has been terminated, or when you’ve been offered a lump sum in our denied permanent health insurance guide here [LINK].
Frequently Asked Questions
Claims can be very significant. Each claim can only have retrospective effect, but reinstating lost benefits could lay the ground for payment until retirement which could be life changing.
We often persuade the insurers to honour PHI claims without resorting to lengthy and stressful appeals. However, time frames are hard to predict as they are dependent on many factors, such as the severity of your injury or condition and the behaviour of the insurers.
A complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service for denied PHI claims can take many months or more.
Our team know, from many years of experience, how these claims work and how insurers are likely to behave. The sooner you contact us the better.
We would prefer to advise you even before an insurer has made its initial decision. Insurers seem happy to let people fail to provide what they later say is adequate evidence to prove eligibility for PHI benefits. For example a GP fit note may be a poor substitute for a consultant’s report that we would help obtain with some carefully worded instructions.
We would certainly prefer to advise you before insurers reach a Final Decision and then again before you complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Problems with lack of evidence at the start of a claim can be difficult to rectify later.
We can also obtain rapid advice for you from our employment lawyers. Employers have duties in law including the Disability Discrimination Act, in relation to employees who are unwell.
Our track record includes successes with claims against Unum, Liverpool Victoria, Aviva, Canada Life, Zurich and many other insurers.
Our personal injury expertise means that have an understanding of the medical aspects of your claim and excellent links with medical experts in the right disciplines. We will bring these experts to bear on your case, to help get you the right result.
For ongoing, long-term claims an insurer may offer you a lump sum.
Careful consideration and urgent legal advice needs to be taken on any lump sum offer. Refusal of a lump sum offer does not necessarily lead to a quiet life in the future. The fact is that the file will have come to the top of the pile and refusal of a lump sum offer may well lead to the insurer targeting the claim and indeed seeking to terminate it at a later date.
However, before any lump sum offer is refused it is worth considering both the amount offered and whether insurers would be prepared to increase it.
The best prospect of obtaining an increased offer is when there is up to date medical evidence; without rejecting the offer out of hand a request can be made to insurers for a more reasonable sum, to which you should always copy in your employers.
You need to remember that any lump sum will be less than the total value of a policy up to the date of termination (often the age of 65) for three reasons:
- your health might improve enough for you to be able to take up some kind of employment
- you are receiving the money up front and can invest it how you wish
- you may regrettably die before the termination date in the policy.
A lump sum offer will normally be made direct to the employer or their broker. You should request in writing a copy of the offer letter and ask about the time limit on the offer.
If you want to accept a lump sum offer, you should give it urgent attention because there will be a time limit on the offer. However, without prior tax clearance, it will be subject to tax and therefore may not be reasonable or acceptable to cover your needs.
The employer who is the insured under the group scheme should apply on your behalf to HMRC for the appropriate tax clearance under Section 406 (b) ITEPA 2003. This provides that a prior application must be made by the employer to their tax office requesting tax clearance with up to date medical evidence. This can normally be in the form of a GP letter and a consultant’s letter. HMRC will also request a copy of the terms and conditions of your employment and the offer letter from the insurer.
One difficulty with obtaining tax clearance is that we are seeing an increasing number of cases where employers – particularly large ones – say they are too busy to get involved with making an application for tax clearance. A solicitor should therefore offer you assistance in the application for tax clearance and in liaising with your employers.
Speak to our specialists in denied PHI now by calling
0800 923 2068
What to do if you are having problems with a permanent health insurance claim
When dealing with an insurance claim, whether it is a group or individual policy, a number of problems may arise. Here, our team of specialist solicitors give you the guidance you need so you can understand the best way to proceed.
This could be at the start of the appeal process, for either a group or individual PHI policy. Either way, combating their medical evidence in conjunction with your own medical advisers early on is key to success.
Often the employer is either not particularly supportive or fairly inattentive regarding the necessary paperwork for an appeal. They may no longer be paying you because of your long-term absence, the main issue is to first obtain a copy of the insurer’s Letter of Refusal and then request copies of any documents it refers to.
The documents may contain reference to material from other doctors, or from the insurer’s Chief Medical Officers (CMOs), who in reality are often self-employed doctors such as retired GPs. Insurers may be reluctant to disclose this information and if they are not prepared to do so a formal request should be made under the Data Protection Act. The letter may also be inaccurate about your medical condition.
If you are receiving payments under a group PHI scheme your claim will be regularly reviewed. Often insurers will try and do this on an annual or even more regular basis.
The Financial Ombudsman Service have established that a reasonable period for a review is not less than every 12 months. Insurers sometimes try and put a claim under almost continuous review i.e. setting up a review which lasts over six months and then almost immediately starting a new one. These reviews are particularly stressful. As well as forms to complete, a review may well consist of a visit from someone appointed by the insurers.
Insurers may also request an appointment with a medical expert nominated by them. In the event that this happens, it is sensible to take advice before such an appointment, request a copy of their CV, take someone with you to any appointment, and avoid any request for a home visit. It is possible that the expert they select will be an Occupational Health Physician (or even a Psychiatrist) rather than one relevant to your particular medical condition. The GMC Good Practice Guidelines (2013), state that the doctor should have expertise in the condition and should not leave out any relevant material.
Other matters to consider carefully in a review are any Activity Questionnaire sent to you by insurers. These are forms with limited space so always attach a more detailed schedule. Great care needs to be taken in completing the form. Insurers also actively use surveillance and monitor social media.
This will obviously come as a great shock and, in the event your claim is terminated, urgent advice needs to be taken.
Initially, the Letter of Termination needs to be carefully considered. For example, the first letter will normally not be marked as a “Final Decision” letter, leaving the opportunity to appeal against it before a Final Decision Letter is issued.
Once a letter is issued marked “Final Decision Letter” there is only a six month time limit in which to make a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service so care needs to be taken to put in the best possible appeal within this period.
The key issue (which the Ombudsman will also consider) is your own medical evidence; specifically any consultant’s evidence. Other important documents are your precise job specification and your analysis of any reports or surveillance obtained by insurers.
Again, if reports are not disclosed by the insurer, a request should be made under the Data Protection Act. If surveillance has been carried out, request in writing both the DVD and also the written reports. Urgent advice should be taken on any Letter of Termination.
Sarah* had an ongoing condition and was off work for some considerable time. Her PHI policy continued to pay monthly payments until such a time her employer’s insurer offer to consolidate payment and offered her a lump sum.
Without specialist legal advice, Sarah decided to refuse the lump sum. Her thinking was that, as she had a real medical issue, there was no problem with continuing to receive monthly payments and she would easily be able to argue her case, based on genuine medical evidence.
Unfortunately, after refusing the lump sum, Sarah received a letter in the post with recordings that had been taken by a private investigator. With this information, the insurer argued that they had reason to cease payments immediately.
Sarah was obviously upset at receiving this information. However she couldn’t find any solicitors to help with her case, until she contacted Royds Withy King’s PHI team.
Along with Royds Withy King’s help, Sarah embarked on a lengthy – but ultimately successful – appeal process which took some nine months, during which time she was left without any income.
Sarah had this to say about the help she received:
“They understand insurance companies and the way they operate; especially when it comes to video evidence. If anyone found themselves in the same position, I’d say contact Royds Withy King without a shadow of a doubt.
You need the right person for the job, and you certainly get what you pay for with Royds Withy King; you can’t put a price on their knowledge. There was no stone left unturned, and even though Royds Withy King are based a long way from me, it didn’t matter at all, they were so responsive and reassuring. I couldn’t have asked for any more – they were absolutely brilliant.”
*our client’s name has been changed for legal reasons