August 3, 2010

‘Warning for “Copy-Cats” Traders (Vodkat appeal)’ by Stephen Welfare

The High Court had found against the manufacturers of Vodkat in February of this year for extended passing-off. Vodkat sounds like vodka, and is very similar to vodka, but it isn’t the same. Following the champagne cases, the court ruled that using confusing labelling and/or descriptions was unlawful.

The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision even though vodka lacked any reputation for superiority.

Extended passing-off arises where there is inappropriate use of any sufficiently descriptive or generic term for a particular class of goods. It protects the goodwill in the class of goods, whereas mere passing-off protects the reputation of a particular business.

The Court of Appeal decision is surely a decisive warning to copycat traders.

Share on:

Your Comments

Leave a comment

Thank you for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated. Please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name or it will be deleted.