July 24, 2014

Delay in resigning because of sick leave does not preclude constructive dismissal claim

The Employment Tribunal rejected the claim for constructive unfair dismissal because it considered the 6 week delay between the last breach of contract and the resignation was fatal to his claim that the resignation was in response to the breach. However when the Claimant appealed to the EAT, it allowed the appeal and remitted the case back to a different Tribunal for rehearing. The EAT considered the delay point and considered that the amount of time between the breach and the resignation depended on context. For instance, employees with heavy family commitments requiring an income may delay longer in resigning because of the need for on-going financial input. It also considered the fact that the employee in this case was absent from work whereas, if he had been present, he could have been considered to have affirmed the breach. However, because he was on sick leave it was not so easy to draw this inference.

This legal update is provided for general information purposes only and should not be applied to specific circumstances without prior consultation with us.

For further details on any of the issues covered in this update please contact Gemma Ospedale, Partner in Employment on 020 7583 2222.

Share on:

Your Comments

Leave a comment

Thank you for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated. Please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name or it will be deleted.