Posted by Natalie Birrell (PR Consultant),
On 1 September 2016 Withy King LLP merged with Royds LLP. The trading name for the merged firm is Royds Withy King. All content produced prior to this date will remain in the name of the firms pre-merger.
Dismissal decision fair – restored by Court of Appeal
The situation occurred when an employee left a shop at City Airport where he worked, carrying items for which he had not paid. The Court of Appeal held that in the circumstances the employer could not be criticised for not undertaking further investigation because it was reasonable for the employer to conclude, in all the circumstances, that the employee was not telling the truth when he stated that he genuinely did not realise he had left the boundaries of the shop. On this basis the Court of Appeal held that the employer was entitled to take a contrary view of the employee’s creditability and conflicting evidence to that of the employee even though it did not view available CCTV footage or speak to other witnesses.
Interestingly, prior to the Tribunal claim, the Claimant was tried and acquitted of theft in the Criminal Courts. It is therefore understandable by he would feel aggrieved at losing an unfair dismissal claim. However, this case endorses the fact that in cases of dismissal it is the employer’s reasonable belief which has to be taken into account and is the point on which the Tribunal should focus in deciding unfair dismissal claims. In this case, the Court of Appeal held that the employer did have a reasonable belief that the employee was not telling the truth.
This legal update is provided for general information purposes only and should not be applied to specific circumstances without prior consultation with us.
For further details on any of the issues covered in this update please contact Gemma Ospedale, Partner in Employment on 020 7583 2222.
Royds Import Case Law Update
Keeping you informed about Royds Import Case Law Update news, events and opinion.