Search our news, events & opinions

27 November 2018 0 Comments
Posted in Medical Negligence

Can patient confidentiality be a bad thing for the health of others? A recent case suggests: yes

Posted by , Legal Claims Manager

If a family member was diagnosed with, or died as a result of, a genetic disease, you would want to know. A recent case between a woman and St. George’s Hospital in London throws into question whether doctors have a responsibility to inform families of a patient’s health.

As we come to understand genetics further, it is also understood that one patient’s health status could impact upon many more people. Well one woman, whose father was a patient in St. George’s Hospital, London, has experience of this first-hand and is bringing a case as a result.

She contends that doctors should have told her that her father had Huntington’s disease (a hereditary condition): had she been informed she would not have had her daughter, who is now eight years old. Both she and her daughter have a 50% chance of developing the degenerative disease, which is fatal.

The woman’s case, initially struck out, has now been referred back by the Court of Appeal, meaning that a new interpretation of duty of care could be enshrined in law.

How does this affect duty of care?

Doctors owe their patients a duty of care. This means that doctors have a general duty to take reasonable care to avoid foreseeable injury to their patients. They also have a duty of patient confidentiality, which means that ordinarily, they may not disclose details of patients’ health to third parties without prior consent.

However, if this case were to succeed, doctors would owe a duty of care not just to their patients but also to anyone who could be affected by that patient’s condition. Typically, this will include family members who share some of that patient’s genetic makeup. Of course, this doesn’t just mean that the definition of ‘duty of care’ changes, but also ‘patient’.

How might this affect people more widely?

As our knowledge of genetics in medicine grows, new ethical issues are produced. If the case succeeds at the Court of Appeal, then patients’ genetic characteristics and in particular their genetically-determined conditions may increasingly become a matter of wider concern, if not actually public record. Doctors might be obliged to disclose details of heritable conditions to interested parties as a matter of good practice. Failure to do so could lead to more cases of this sort, in which patients allege that they would not have had families had they known that they risked passing on serious conditions to their children.

If you have experienced a missed diagnosis, and suffered harm as a result, then get in touch with our medical negligence team to see how we can help.

0800 923 2080     Email uswkcn.enquiries@roydswithyking.com

Leave a comment

Thank you for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated and please do not use a spammy keyword or a domain as your name or it will be deleted.

*required*

**required*

*optional*

Medical Negligence

Medical negligence solicitors who understand what you’re going through

Learn more

Legal Claims Manager

T: 01225 730 287 (DDI)
Email

Search our news, events & opinions