Posted by Amy Light, Paralegal (ACILEx)
A rare successful undue influence case
It has long been established that a Will can be challenged on the grounds of undue influence. However the evidential threshold to prove undue influence has been set high by the courts so successful cases are few and far between. This week one of these rare cases has been reported in the context of three daughters contesting their mother’s Will on the grounds that their father and brother pressured their mother to leave her whole estate to their brother.
In terms of challenging a Will, to succeed in a claim of “undue influence”, the courts have suggested that there must be no other explanation for the Will other than that the person in question was unduly influenced. This is a very high evidential burden to cross. It is particularly difficult, because most instances of undue pressure upon an elderly person take place behind closed doors and in circumstances where the “victim” has now died.
The Chin Family
The Chin family moved to the United Kingdom from Hong Kong in 1965 and settled in Essex. Mr and Mrs Chin established a successful restaurant business, which allowed them to amass a property portfolio with an estimated value of £3 million.
It has been reported that Mr Chin is a “traditionalist” and wished for the family’s entire fortune to pass to their only son, Winston. By contrast, Mrs Chin wished to leave something to her five daughters. In 2009 Mrs Chin made a Will, which divided her share in the family business equally between her six children. However, following constant arguments and pressure from Mr Chin, she was persuaded to make a further Will in 2011 cutting the daughters out and leaving everything to Winston.
It is understood that Winston was already wealthy and prior to Mrs Chin’s death in 2015, aged 82, the majority of the family’s assets had already been passed to Winston.
One of Mr and Mrs Chin’s daughters, Ivy, challenged the 2011 Will on the grounds that Mrs Chin was subject to undue influence from Mr Chin and/or Winston when executing the Will.
Judge Jarman QC found that the 2011 Will had been “procured by the undue influence of her husband and/or son”. Further that the Will “represented her husband’s wishes and not her own”. Therefore Judge Jarman QC overturned the 2011 Will in favour of the 2009 Will, meaning the daughters will now receive a share of their mother’s estate.
This case shows that despite a high level of evidence required, challenges to Wills on the ground of undue influence can succeed.
Our specialist team advise on the merits of any potential challenges to a Will. If you wish to discuss a potential claim contact our Contested Wills, Trusts & Inheritance Disputes team on
0800 923 2070 Email us
Keeping you informed about Private Client news, events and opinion.